Skip to content

Army 31, EMU 27 game review

September 5, 2010

Once each year, fans pack fill show up at Rynearson Stadium. Once each year, EMU is undefeated. Once each year hopes are high.

Then the season starts.

Last night was an odd game, for a number of reasons. First, there was simply a massive amount of rushing. 594 yards, to be exact, with just 96 yards of passing. That’s enough for EMU to rank 14th in the nation in rushing yards after one week (first in the MAC), and as individual rushers, Dwayne Priest ranks 12th nationally (1st in the MAC) with 142 net yards and 2 touchdowns, while Alex Gillett ranks 17th nationally (2nd in the MAC) with 126 net yards and a touchdown. Army, meanwhile, comes out 9th nationally in rushing yards, but spread it around more, with four players running for at least 60 yards but none reaching 100.

Neither team particularly cared to pass the ball. Gillett finished the game 4 for 9 for 31 yards, one touchdown, and one interception, and depending on where you look, a quarterback rating of either 87.8 (which would be his career high) or 50.9 — not good either way. Trent Steelman wasn’t much better for the Black Knights, going 5 of 11 for 65 yards, good for a rating of 95.1. That put EMU and Army at 119 and 116, respectively, in passing offense. Can you say “one-dimensional”?Time, and more games, will tell if EMU and Army are really that good on the ground, or if they’re both just that bad at defending the run. Last year, of course, the Eagles had the worst rushing defense in the country, but Army was middle-of-the-pack in this regard. Army’s 2009 rushing offense was 17th in the country, while EMU was 90th, so the fact the we were able to hang with the Black Knights on the ground suggests to me that the Eagles’ ground game — on both sides of the ball — is significantly improved.

The scoreboard and PA failed early in the second quarter and never came back on.

Another interesting aspect of last night’s game were the scoreboard and lighting issues. Early in the second quarter, the lights on the west (pressbox) side of the stadium, as well as the new scoreboard at the north end, went out. The sky was still light, but play stopped for about 12 minutes, before resuming with only the east lights. The west lights gradually came back on, but the scoreboard and public address system were done for the night. During the third quarter, a small portable scoreboard was wheeled out, just north of the north end zone, and it was used to keep time for the fourth quarter. It was a different experience watching college football with no scoreboard and no announcer; it forces you to pay closer attention to the game than you might otherwise, and it’s probably tough on the casual fan. Personally, I enjoyed it, although I don’t know that I’d want to watch every game that way!

I was very disappointed not to say Devontae Payne get any snaps. I think the presence of a legitimate passing threat in EMU’s offense really might have changed the game. As it was, Army had no reason to respect the Eagles’ passing attack, and they were free to crowd the box and focus on the running game. No doubt, Gillett is a legitimate rushing threat, but he’s as bad a passer now as he was at the end of 2009, when he closed out the season with seven interceptions in the final three games. I really think English is limiting the team’s options by leaving Payne on the bench; he would force opposing defenses to respect the EMU passing game, and could open up more room for the running game. English is apparently satisfied with the passing game, saying:

“We had success running it. That dictated us not throwing if we didn’t have to,” he said. “I think we’ll be able to throw the ball. We’ve shown that in practice. That isn’t a big issue, and we’d probably like to throw it more next week if the game dictates it.”

In the third quarter, Army scored a field goal off a fumbled EMU kick return.

All else considered, this was a game EMU could have won, but as they did against Army last year, they killed themselves with turnovers.  A Dwayne Priest fumble on EMU’s 10-yard line set up Army’s touchdown in the first quarter. In the second quarter, Gillett threw an interception near mid-field that lead to another Army touchdown. In the third quarter, Kelip Goodwin fumbled a kick return on EMU’s side of the field that set up Army’s field goal. If EMU continues to give opponents 17 points off turnovers, this season will look an awful lot like 2009.

One other disappointing aspect was the attendance, which was just 11,318, more than 3,000 fewer people than attended the same game in 2009. That bodes very poorly for EMU’s efforts to reach an average of 15,000 per game, required by the NCAA to stay in the Football Bowl Subdivision.

But neither the passing game, nor the rushing defense, nor the power issues, nor the turnovers, nor the attendance were the low point of the night. That came just before the opening kickoff, when the Army band struck up “The Hey Song” as the EMU Marching Band was playing The Star Spangled Banner. Of all the bands in the country, I would have expected Army’s band to display more respect for our country than that.

Advertisements
4 Comments leave one →
  1. September 5, 2010 1:38 pm

    And yes, I’m aware that the Army band, en masse, came over after the halftime show to apologize to the EMU band, but that’s a tough one to apologize for, and it wasn’t just the EMU band that was offended.

    I will say, however, that an announcement that the national anthem was being played would have been nice — that was before the electrical issues. So I do place some of the blame for this on the announcer. But the conductor for the Army band should have had the sense not to start playing while EMU was in the middle of their pregame show; it’s rude regardless of what music is being played, and I can’t recall it happening at any other game I’ve attended.

  2. BeatNavy permalink
    September 6, 2010 8:13 am

    A couple of things really helped your rushing attack — your new offense (which we had not seen on tape) and the fact that during the game, we lost two starting LBs and one of #2 LB.

    Good luck the rest of the way.

    • September 6, 2010 9:33 am

      Part of me wishes our rushing attack hadn’t worked quite so well; it would have forced more passing, and might have lead to Payne getting some playing time. But if Gillett’s bad passing at the end of last season didn’t do it, I don’t know that one or two more bad games will. I’m just not a fan of Gillett, and he hasn’t shown any indication that he can lead this team to victory.

  3. Aaron permalink
    September 6, 2010 3:23 pm

    Great recap! i like your insight.

    I wasn’t nearly as happy as you about our defense. Our cornerbacks started each play by providing the receiver with a 10 yard cushion. Our tackling was atrocious. I would love to see how many yards Army ball-rushers gained after getting hit. it seemed really, really high to me.

    just my 2 cents. i appreciate your blog and look forward to more posts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: